FOE Canada FOE Canada




FOE News!

Developing Water Soft Paths in Canadian Municipalities: A Guidebook for Municipal Staff

A practical introduction to water soft path (WSP) implementation, the guidebook describes the steps in water soft path planning for municipalities, illustrated with a case study.  This guidebook is the key resource for workshops with municipal planners interested in exploring what WSP offers for municipalities that want and need to go beyond efficiency and demand management.  WSP is an exciting concept that helps groups look into the future and design a pathway to reach that desirable future by looking at water in a holistic way.  WSP promotes matching water quality with water use, finding creative ways to conserve water and by asking why is water needed for a particular use, leads to opportunities for innovation, education and awareness building about the importance of water quality and quantity.

Information That Municipalities Should Bring to Water Soft Path. 

TO INQUIRE ABOUT HOLDING A WORKSHOP IN YOUR COMMUNITY AND HOW YOU CAN HELP US SPREAD THIS IMPORTANT TOOL FOR CANADA’S WATER FUTURE, CONTACT FOE AT  613 241-0085  or email foe@foecanada.org


 
 Home
 About FoE
 Campaigns
 DONATE NOW
 Media Centre
 EarthWords
 Opportunities
 Contact Us
 Privacy Policy
 Ami(e)s de la Terre Outaouais


Click here to read our E-Newsletter
Canada’s top court upholds right to launch environmental class action lawsuits   PDF  Print  E-mail 

For Immediate Release - November 20, 2008

Canada’s top court upholds right to launch environmental class action lawsuits

OTTAWA – Environmental advocates are hailing a precedent-setting ruling from the Supreme Court of Canada today in the case of St. Lawrence Cement Inc. v. Barrette, which upheld the right for citizens to launch environmental class action lawsuits.

Represented by pro bono lawyers from Ecojustice (formerly Sierra Legal Defence Fund) and the firm of Lauzon Bélanger, the Quebec Environmental Law Centre and Friends of the Earth Canada intervened in the dispute to defend the rights of Canadians to use class action procedures in environmental nuisance cases. The groups also sought to challenge a controversial Quebec Court of Appeal decision that would have prevented class action lawsuits over environmental harm.

“This is a massive victory for everyday citizens and the environmental community,” said Will Amos, a lawyer from the uOttawa-Ecojustice Environmental Law Clinic who co-argued the case. “In terms of access to justice, in terms of enhanced environmental protection through nuisance claims, and in terms of the entrenchment of the polluter pays principle, we are very pleased with this decision.”

The Supreme Court also settled a longstanding debate under Quebec’s civil law system by ruling that nuisance claims only require proof of “abnormal inconvenience”, and do not require proof of wrongdoing or “fault”.  “The result is that future environmental nuisance claims will be more easily proven under a no-fault regime, and polluters will have even more incentive to clean up their act to avoid being sued by their neighbours,” stated Amos.

“The Court not only confirmed that citizens play an important role in bringing environmental nuisance claims, it upheld one of the most important principles in environmental law – that polluters must pay.” said Jean-Francois Girard, Director of the Quebec Centre for Environmental Law.

The lawsuit began when a class action brought by neighbours of a controversial Quebec City cement factory sought compensation for damage caused by the factory’s operation, including noise, odour, and dust problems.  Although the Quebec Superior Court upheld their claim and ordered St. Lawrence Cement to pay $15 million in damages, the Quebec Court of Appeal reversed this decision, concluding that nuisance claims could not be brought as a class action proceeding and that only landowners could participate. Today’s decision upheld the Superior Court decision.

“This decision of the Supreme Court reinstates the possibility of implementing class action procedures in environmental cases, a possibility that had been, for all practical purposes, shut out by the Quebec Appeal Court,” stated Michel Bélanger, counsel at Lauzon Bélanger in Montreal.

“Through our intervention in the citizens’ case, we were seeking to uphold citizens’ rights to launch environmental class action lawsuits so that Canadians can do what is needed when the government cannot or will not take adequate action to protect the environment,” stated Beatrice Olivastri, CEO of Friends of the Earth Canada. “We congratulate Madame Barrette, Monsieur Cochrane and their colleagues on their success and thank them on behalf of all Canadians.  Because of their fortitude in pursuing their case, the court has protected access to environmental justice both in Québec and in the rest of Canada.”

For more information, please contact:

Will Amos, Ecojustice (613) 562 5800 ext. 3378
Beatrice Olivastri, Friends of the Earth Canada (613) 724 8690
Michel Bélanger, Lauzon Bélanger Inc. (514) 927-6195
Jean-François Girard, Centre québécois du droit de l’environnement (514) 577-3715